Southern Leopard Frog
Lithobates sphenocephalus (Cope, 1886)
Taxonomy
| Kingdom | Animalia |
|---|---|
| Phylum | Chordata |
| Subphylum | Vertebrata |
| Class | Amphibia |
| Order | Anura |
| Family | Ranidae |
| Genus | Lithobates |
| Species | Lithobates sphenocephalus (Cope, 1886) |
Description
Diagnostic characters
- Ecological class
- Trogloxene
- Realm
- Terrestrial
Distribution
Range
Known from 14 counties across five states.
Continent
North America
Country
United States
States and provinces
Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Tennessee
Counties
- Arkansas
- Independence, Stone
- Florida
- Alachua, Columbia, Jackson, Levy, Marion
- Georgia
- Grady
- Kentucky
- Breckinridge, Edmonson
- Tennessee
- Knox, Marion, Roane, Rutherford
Conservation and management
IUCN Red List
LC Least Concern
Assessed in 2021.
NatureServe
G5 Secure
National ranks
- United States
- N5 Secure
Subnational ranks
- Maryland
- S4 Apparently Secure
- Virginia
- S4 Apparently Secure
- Kentucky
- S5 Secure
- Texas
- S5 Secure
- North Carolina
- S5 Secure
- South Carolina
- S5 Secure
- Oklahoma
- SNR Unranked
- Louisiana
- S5 Secure
- Missouri
- S5 Secure
- District of Columbia
- S2 Imperiled
- Alabama
- S5 Secure
- Kansas
- S5 Secure
- Mississippi
- S5 Secure
- Tennessee
- S5 Secure
- Iowa
- S4 Apparently Secure
- Florida
- S5 Secure
- Pennsylvania
- S1 Critically Imperiled
- Arkansas
- S5 Secure
- Georgia
- S5 Secure
- Indiana
- S4 Apparently Secure
- New Jersey
- S5 Secure
- Delaware
- S5 Secure
- Illinois
- S5 Secure
State and federal status
Not listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act
References
- Brock, K.A. & Bortone, S.A. 1977. Cave dwelling fishes in panhandle Florida. Florida Scientist 40: 406–407. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24320078.
- Franz, R., Bauer, J. & Morris, T. 1994. Review of biologically significant caves and their faunas in Florida and south Georgia. Brimleyana 20: 1–109. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/229726.
- Hobbs & H.H. Jr. 1942. The Crayfishes of Florida. University of Florida Biological Science Series Volume 3, Issue 2, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 179 pp.
- Lewis, J.J. 2005. A biological inventory of caves of the Cumberland Plateau. Tennessee Chapter Cave Program, The Nature Conservancy, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 156 pp.
- Lewis, J.J. & Lewis, S.L. 2007. A biological reconnaissance of selected caves in the Highland Rim area of central Tennessee. Tennessee Chapter Cave Program, The Nature Conservancy, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 42 pp.
- McDaniel, V.R. & Gardner, J.E. 1977. Cave fauna of Arkansas: vertebrate taxa. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science 31: 68–71. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol31/iss1/22.
- Niemiller, M.L. & Miller, B.T. 2009. A survey of the cave-associated herpetofauna of the eastern United States with an emphasis on salamanders. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Speleology, Kerrville, Texas, USA, Volume 1: 249–256.
- Pearson, W.D. & Boston, C.H., Jr. 1995. Distribution and status of the northern cavefish, Amblyopsis spelaea. Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program,, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 99 pp.
- Pylka, J.M. 1957. Cave vertebrates of Florida. The Florida Speleologist 1: 6–7.
- Simmons, D.D. 1975. The evolutionary ecology of Gyrinophilus palleucus. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 105 pp.
- Zigler, K.S., Niemiller, M.L., Stephen, C.D.R., Ayala, B.N., Milne, M.A., Gladstone, N.S., Engel, A.S., Jensen, J.B., Camp, C.D., Ozier, J.C. & Cressler, A. 2020. Biodiversity from caves and other subterranean habitats of Georgia, USA. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 82: 125–167. doi:10.4311/2019LSC0125
How to cite this account
Lithobates sphenocephalus (Cope, 1886). Cave Biology Data Portal, account SP-2595. https://cavebiology.org/species/lithobates-sphenocephalus/ (accessed 7 September 2026).
Data sources and funding are listed in the Acknowledgments.
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction. Accounts are compiled from many sources and corrections from people who know the group are the most useful email we get.